Your next deal already engaged with your content. You just didn't notice.
Most sales teams live in their CRM. They track email opens, demo requests, whitepaper downloads. They treat those as intent signals. Meanwhile, a VP at a target account has been liking your CEO's posts for three weeks. A director at another account just followed three of your executives in one day. A procurement lead hit the Insight reaction on your pricing post yesterday.
These are not vanity metrics. They are buying signals dressed as social engagement. And most companies have no system for reading them.
I built one. I call it the Koka Signal Model. It turns passive social engagement into a scored pipeline signal you can act on, route, and close.
Why Traditional Intent Data Fails
Third-party intent data tells you a company visited a pricing page. It doesn't tell you who. It doesn't tell you why. It gives you an account-level flag and a prayer that someone in your SDR queue picks up the phone.
Social signals are different. They are identity-tied. You know exactly who engaged. You know what content triggered the response. You know the reaction type — which, as I'll show you, carries dramatically different meaning depending on which emoji they chose.
A VP who clicks Like on your blog post could be skimming. A VP who hits Insight on your framework post is thinking deeply about your space. One of these is worth 5x the other. Traditional intent tools treat them the same. They're not the same.
"A like on your CEO's post is a buying signal dressed as a thumb. Your CRM shows cold accounts. LinkedIn shows warm ones."
The Signal Scoring Formula
Single signals are weak. Anyone can accidentally like a post. Compound signals — multiple engagement types from multiple people at the same account in a short window — are where pipeline lives.
Here is the formula I use to score every contact in my signal database:
The Koka Signal Score
// Follow Weight
1pt — follows 1 executive
3pts — follows 2+ executives
5pts — follows executive + company page
// Reaction Diversity
1pt — 1 reaction type used
3pts — 2+ reaction types used
5pts — Insight reaction present
// Recency Factor
3pts — engagement in last 7 days
2pts — 7-14 days
1pt — 14-30 days
0pt — 30+ days (treat as cold)
// Executive Coverage
1pt — engaged with 1 exec's content
3pts — engaged with 2+ execs' content
// Account Density (add when applicable)
1pt — 1 person from company engaging
3pts — 2+ people from company
5pts — 3+ people including an executive
Let me walk through a real example. A VP of Marketing at a Series B company follows you and your CEO. She's used the Insight reaction on two of your posts in the last week, and a Like on a third. She engaged with both your content and your CEO's. One other person from her company liked your post last week.
Follow Weight: follows 2+ execs = 3pts × 1.5 = 4.5. Reaction Diversity: Insight present = 5pts × 2 = 10. Recency: last 7 days = 3pts. Executive Coverage: 2+ execs' content = 3pts. Account Density: 2+ people = 3pts.
Total: 23.5. That's not a lead. That's a deal waiting to happen. And the signal didn't come from your CRM. It came from your LinkedIn notifications.
The Four Signal Tiers
Once you score a contact, you need to know what to do. I use a four-tier system that maps directly to action.
The key discipline: do not jump the tiers. A contact who scores a 3 today might be a 10 in three weeks. If you pitch them at a 3, you burn the relationship before it builds. The signal model forces patience. Wait for the compound. Move when the math says move.
Every Reaction Carries a Different Story
LinkedIn gives you nine reactions. Most people treat them as interchangeable. They are not. Each one reveals something different about the person behind it.
| Reaction | Psychology | Signal | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 Like | Acknowledgment, "I saw this" | Lowest intent, highest volume. Baseline engagement. | 1x |
| 🎉 Celebrate | Enthusiasm, shared excitement | Alignment signal. Positive disposition toward you or your company. | 2x |
| 💡 Insight | Deep intellectual resonance | Highest-value buying signal. They're thinking seriously about your space. | 3x |
| ❤️ Love | Strong affinity, emotional connection | Brand affinity. Superfan potential. Also a recruiting signal. | 3x |
| 🙌 Support | Empathy, "I'm with you on this" | Relationship-ready. Trust already exists. Warm outreach opportunity. | 2x |
| 😄 Funny | Entertainment value, personality fit | Culture alignment. Not a buying signal but a relationship opener. | 1.5x |
| 😢 Sad | Emotional resonance with a challenge | Pain point validation. They recognize the problem you're describing. | 2x |
| 😠 Angry | Strong disagreement or shared frustration | Monitor. Could be an objection to address or industry frustration to validate. | Monitor |
The Insight reaction is the one you're hunting for. When someone hits Insight on your framework post, they're not just scrolling. They're processing. They're applying your thinking to their situation. That is the signal of someone who will take a meeting — not because you pitched them, but because they already did the mental work of connecting your ideas to their problems.
The reaction pattern matters as much as the individual reaction. Someone who uses the same reaction on every post is skimming. Someone who uses mixed reactions across different content types is genuinely reading. Someone who reacts to posts from 30 days ago is digging into your profile — researching you the way a buyer researches a vendor before reaching out.
Signal Decay: Why Timing Matters
Signals have half-lives. A reaction from 3 hours ago is actionable. A reaction from 3 weeks ago is noise.
0-24 hours: 100% hot. Reference the specific post in your outreach.
24-72 hours: 80% warm. Reference the topic, not the post.
3-7 days: 60% warm. General topic outreach.
7-14 days: 30% lukewarm. Standard nurture. Don't reference the engagement.
14-30 days: 10% cold. Treat as cold contact.
30+ days: 0%. Re-warm before any outreach.
From Score to Pipeline: The Workflow
The model is useless if it stays theoretical. Here's how you operationalize it.
Step one: Build a watchlist. Identify 20-30 target accounts and map the key executives. Follow them. Monitor their engagement with your content and your executive team's content.
Step two: Score weekly. Once a week, run the formula against every contact who showed any signal activity. Update the scores. Watch for movers — people who jumped from Warming to Hot since last week.
Step three: Route by tier. Cold contacts stay tracked. Warming contacts go into a light nurture sequence — engage with their content, don't pitch. Hot contacts get outreach within 72 hours with a message that references the engagement. Urgent contacts get same-day outreach.
Step four: Track signal-to-meeting conversion. Measure how many scored contacts become conversations, then meetings, then pipeline. This is how you prove the model works — and how you justify building infrastructure around it.
The companies that win at this don't have better products. They have better signal detection. They see the deal before anyone else does. That's the advantage.
Want to build a signal detection engine for your pipeline?
The 90-Day Executive Visibility Program includes the full signal tracking framework: scoring templates, tier routing rules, and the outreach playbook that turns reactions into revenue.
Book a Strategy Call →